Wednesday Words
To Go Where Your VisionPoints, a few inspiration points for you and your business.
Goldman Sachs’ history began in New York City when a German immigrant, Marcus Goldman, opened a one-room office on Pine Street in 1869.
—Goldman Sachs’ corporate website
Cue the violins. So begins the tale of a small business that got awfully big.
On Tuesday Senator Susan Collins, R-Maine, asked executives of Goldman Sachs, the Wall Street giant charged with fraud, who spoke in front of the U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, whether they believe they have a duty to act in the best interest of their clients.
She got several different and evasive answers, from which my favorite remarks are Joshua Birnbaum’s “Conceptually that doesn’t seem like an issue…” (Conceptually? How about actually? Doesn’t seem like an issue? That doesn’t seem to have any meaning…) and Fabrice “Fabulous Fab” Tourre’s “I do not believe we act as an investment advisor to our clients.”
Hm. Funny, Goldman’s website seems to think they do:
[In 2003 we added] financial counseling to our roster of traditional investment advisory services…
We don’t usually get into current events here at MCE, but this stinky business has a very MCE angle to it if you look in the right light.
The truth is GS does not see the end-clients as their customers.
Here at Maximum Customer Experience this is both disturbing and in a sickening way, impressive. Goldman is not alone in their singular focus on the very real, and very Ideal Customer—the guy who’s buying their stock.
Whatever they may claim (from their website: “Helping high-net-worth individuals, their families and foundations build and preserve their financial wealth…”), Goldman is not there for those individuals and families, their so-called “clients.” I’m sure there are some mighty fine humans within the company, but like everybody else on Wall Street the company serves their stock price, not the folks who trust them as investment advisors. To invest with them without knowing you are a stock-price-pushing pawn is to be an even bigger sap than they think you are. We don’t like the result, but I think it’ll be awfully difficult to claim it’s illegal, since everyone from finance firms to big box stores is doing it.
[A slight tangent—surprise! Your favorite discount mega-corporation is not serving you. They’re serving people who own hundreds of thousands of shares in their company. People who thrill to layoffs (long lines, no help) and cost (quality)-cutting, and lobbyists who keep their execs out of messy Senate subcommittee hearings.]
So, yeah. That focus—to the utter exclusion of the individuals whose futures they’ve crushed—geez, I can almost like that. I can’t help commenting. The focus GS has on their Ideal Customer is pretty wow.
The people-crushing is revolting, and that’s the other aspect that I can’t help commenting on. Maximum Customer Experience starts with a singular focus on your Ideal Customer. And finishes with delivering eye-opening, expectation-busting delight to everyone who walks through your door.
Because anyone may know your Ideal Customer, and would love to buzz you up to them.
Because things may change, and they may become your Ideal someday.
And because it’s the right thing to do, fercryingoutloud.
Those individual end-clients of Goldman’s may not be the Ideal, but without them there won’t be a stock price to push up.
I guess I’m just thinking that when our companies finally get big, it sucks to forget who stood by loyally all those years while we were busy growing the company with their dollars. Not very Maximum, that.
I’m also thinking Senator Collins asked the wrong question. Senator Collins, you might have asked why call the individual investors “clients” at all?
Tools, I believe, is the word.
Grow and be well,
Kelly Erickson
P.S. YES! The last couple of years of sordid revelations from big businesses of all stripes have confirmed that it’s you and me—the little businesses—who can really make experiences Maximum and mean it, day after day. It’s your competitive edge over all these Big (and sometimes bad) Boys. Hooray for small business!












28 April 2010, 9:55 am
You are so right, and yes, they will get away with it because it is the current American Big Business model.
Your post should be required reading for every one in this country, yet one wonders if even then most people would get it.
And a big YES to your comment about small business. I’m proud to own a small business where clients are treated like the most important asset of my operation.
28 April 2010, 10:57 am
As I posted on George’s blog — they also had a “slogan” on their website that said something like “Success without integrity is failure”.
Of course they are arguing right now that they had integrity at every step. At least, I guess, certain shades of integrity (probably in the muted range…)
Wow: control prices with your size, know when others will be buying (because you’re buying for them), and make commission on the deal to boot! That’s a cool little business to be in — literally the next best thing to printing money.
What I’m wondering is how many Goldman Sachs companies are still out there, selling off their unwanted bits of paper to their trusting clients…?
~Graham
29 April 2010, 6:43 am
Sylvia,
And I was worried I might get a negative reaction to this post. (Shows how much I know even after all this time writing the blog.) Thanks! Feel free to send a link to everyone in the country, lol, and we’ll see if we can get a movement started!!
Graham,
To take a trip around their website is to induce sudden nausea. I spent a lot of time there after Tuesday’s hearings, sickened and amazed at their sheer gall.
I know some folks in finance pretty well and admire them greatly. None at GS, but I’m sure even there some folks are working their tushes off *for* that end-client. The thing is, at 10,000 feet GS clearly looks a lot different. Their idea of integrity is “not illegal so far” plus “raises stock price.” Blech. But that certainly is focus, of a kind…
What on Earth would Marcus Goldman think??
Regards,
Kelly
29 April 2010, 11:36 am
Yes, reminds me of when I found out that the insurance industry isn’t actually in the insurance business, but the stock market.
So when thousands of doctors in the US didn’t have their malpractice insurance renewed in around 2001, it wasn’t because they did something wrong, it was because the Dow Jones tanked and Hartford started to cut back on their “non-core-business related” expenses.
Like, you know, insurance coverage.
~Graham